pragmaticBIM
Start defining

← All use cases

Architecture - structural coordination

QAS-ARCH-STRUCT-COORD · General · Quality assurance

Align load-bearing components between architecture and structural models - as previously done on 2D concrete pouring plans, now in the model.

Starting point

  • Alignment between architecture and structural engineering previously happened on 2D concrete pouring plans.
  • Without model alignment, deviations arise between architecture and structural geometry - affecting formwork, quantities, and coordination.

Goal & benefit

  • Carry the same load-bearing components in both discipline models with aligned Name.
  • Check across disciplines for deviations, clashes, and missing assignments.

Process

  1. Architect and structural engineer model the same components in their discipline models (architecture rough, structure near-execution).
  2. Align Name per element and merge models in the federated model.
  3. Check for deviations, clashes, and missing assignments; approve the result bindingly.

Outcome

  • Aligned architecture and structural models as the binding planning basis for construction project and execution.

Deliverables

  • Architecture model with rough load-bearing components as IfcFooting, IfcSlab, IfcColumn, IfcBeam, and IfcRoof (pitched) with LoadBearing=TRUE
  • Structural model with the same component types as IfcFooting, IfcSlab, IfcColumn, and IfcBeam (near-execution)
  • IfcProject, IfcSite, IfcBuilding, and IfcBuildingStorey in both models
  • Name per element, consistent across both discipline models

Activated by project goals

Related workflows

Contact

abstract ag

Imprint · Picassoplatz 4, 4052 Basel