pragmaticBIM
Start defining

← All use cases

Competition evaluation with abstractBIM

DES-ABSTRACTBIM-COMP · General · Design

Evaluate competition entries on a comparable basis - independent of each author's modelling style and software.

Starting point

  • Competition entries come from different tools and modelling practices; quantities and metrics are rarely directly comparable.
  • Manual harmonisation for the jury is labor-intensive and error-prone - reliable area and volume comparisons are often missing.

Goal & benefit

  • Bring all entries onto a consistent geometric basis.
  • Provide objective metrics and quantities for jury and client.

Process

  1. Provide each entry's architecture model meeting the minimum requirements (same geometric basis as DES-ABSTRACTBIM-COST).
  2. Upload to abstractBIM.com to build a comparable quantity and space model.
  3. Download the models and systematically compare entry metrics.

Outcome

  • Building volume and gross floor area.
  • Interior and exterior walls with a clear relation to one or two spaces.
  • Slabs, roofs, and base slabs.
  • Windows, doors, and coverings with space relation and direction.

Deliverables

  • Architecture model with IfcProject, IfcSite, IfcBuilding, IfcBuildingStorey, IfcSpace, IfcWindow, and IfcDoor
  • Room name in LongName, optional room number in Name
  • abstractBIM quantities and metrics as the basis for entry comparison

Related workflows

Contact

abstract ag

Imprint · Picassoplatz 4, 4052 Basel